Regarding disclosure of confidential information, which condition is not acceptable?

• A. An attorney sends a counselor a subpoena.
• B. The client provides written consent.
• C. There is imminent danger to a third party.
• D. A court order is issued.

Answer: (A)

Disclosing confidential information is allowed only under specific, carefully justified circumstances: the client gives written consent, there is a real risk of imminent harm to someone, or a court-ordered mandate requires disclosure. The reason a subpoena from an attorney is not an acceptable standalone justification is that it is a legal demand that does not by itself grant consent or address the client's rights and safeguards. Ethical practice requires the counselor to protect confidentiality, review the subpoena, seek to limit the scope of disclosure, notify the client when possible, and pursue protective measures or a court process to determine what must be revealed. In contrast, written consent provides explicit permission, an imminent-danger situation creates a legitimate duty to warn or protect, and a court order legally directs disclosure with procedural safeguards.