When ending counseling, what should counselors provide to avoid abandonment lawsuits?

• A. Give the client adequate notice that the counselor is terminating the counseling relationship.
• B. Terminate immediately without notice.
• C. Provide a vague notice without specifics.
• D. Delay notice to ensure administrative requirements are met.

Answer: (A)

Providing adequate notice when ending counseling is essential to prevent abandonment and support a safe, responsible transition for the client. This approach reflects the counselor’s duty to avoid abrupt or unexplained exits from care. By giving sufficient notice, the counselor creates space for the client to process the decision, arrange ongoing support, and, if needed, secure referrals to other professionals. It also allows time to discuss and document a plan for transferring records with the client’s consent, address any safety concerns, and ensure there are resources available if the client experiences a crisis after termination.

Ending abruptly with no notice disregards the client’s need for continuity of care and can leave them vulnerable, which is why it’s avoided. Providing vague notice fails to offer concrete steps for transition, making it difficult for the client to know what to do next. Delaying notice for administrative reasons can still impede access to care and may be perceived as putting institutional needs above the client’s well-being. In contrast, clear, timely termination with referrals and a transfer plan demonstrates ethical responsibility and supports the client’s ongoing welfare.